Blog

A settlement proposal can look reasonable until a missing retirement account, undisclosed bonus, or unexplained credit balance changes the numbers behind it. Neither spouse can make informed decisions about property division, support, or debt without a reliable financial picture. In divorce mediation, that picture has to be built deliberately.

Maryland uses two court financial statement forms, CC DR 030 Financial Statement and CC DR 031 Financial Statement, when financial disclosure is required. But financial disclosure in divorce mediation usually calls for more than completing a form. Bank records, tax returns, account statements, and documents supporting the value and ownership of property give both spouses something concrete to evaluate.

Why Financial Disclosure Matters in Divorce Mediation

Complete disclosure gives mediation a factual foundation. It lets spouses compare settlement options based on actual income, assets, debts, and expenses rather than assumptions about what exists or what something may be worth.

That matters in Maryland equitable distribution, the process courts use to decide whether an award related to marital property is appropriate and equitable. It also matters when spouses discuss alimony, child support, the family home, and responsibility for joint debt. If the information is incomplete, negotiations can stall or produce terms built on numbers that later prove inaccurate.

A mediator facilitates discussion and helps the parties work toward an agreement. A neutral mediator doesn’t independently investigate hidden assets, decide which spouse is correct, or provide individual legal advice to both spouses. Each person may need independent legal advice to understand what records are missing and how a proposed resolution affects their rights.

What Financial Information Should Be Exchanged

Useful document exchange is organized around the decisions the couple needs to make. Records should be recent enough to show current balances, income changes, new debts, and shifts in household expenses.

Records that often matter in mediation:

• Income records: Recent pay stubs, W-2 forms, tax returns, 1099 forms, bonus information, commissions, deferred compensation, and documentation of self-employment income.
• Cash and investment accounts: Checking, savings, brokerage, cryptocurrency, and other account statements showing current balances and meaningful transfers.
• Real estate records: Deeds, mortgage statements, home equity loan documents, property tax records, and available information about the property’s value.
• Retirement records: Current statements for pensions, 401(k) accounts, individual retirement accounts, deferred compensation plans, and other retirement vehicles.
• Debt records: Credit card statements, vehicle loans, personal loans, medical balances, student loans, and other obligations in either or both names.
• Insurance and expenses: Health, life, disability, auto, and homeowner insurance records, along with recurring child-related and household expenses.

Some assets need closer attention because their value or ownership history isn’t obvious from a monthly statement. A business interest may require a business valuation, a formal assessment of what the business is worth. Stock compensation, trusts, inheritances, and assets acquired before marriage can also require records showing when the asset was received, how it was maintained, and whether marital funds were added to it.

In Maryland, marital property generally refers to property acquired during the marriage, subject to important exceptions. Separate property can include property owned before the marriage or received by gift or inheritance, but classification gets more complicated when accounts are combined, funds are used for joint purposes, or an asset changes significantly in value during the marriage.

Maryland Financial Statements & Mediation Documents

Maryland court forms provide an important starting point, but they aren’t a substitute for the supporting records needed to evaluate a settlement. CC DR 030 applies when the parties’ combined gross monthly income is $30,000 or less; CC DR 031, the General Financial Statement, applies when combined gross monthly income exceeds that threshold. Both forms can organize information about income, expenses, assets, and liabilities, particularly where child support is at issue.

Private mediation often requires a broader exchange. A financial statement can report that a retirement account exists, but the form alone may not reveal account history, the marital portion of the balance, outstanding loans, or tax consequences tied to a future division. The same is true for a family home, closely held business, or investment account.

The practical question for anyone preparing for mediation isn’t simply whether a form has been completed. The question is whether both spouses have enough verified information to assess the choices in front of them. That can include updated records if employment changes, a bonus is paid, an account balance shifts substantially, or a new debt appears during the process.

What to Do When Information Is Missing or Inconsistent

Missing information doesn’t automatically mean someone is hiding assets. It does mean both parties should slow down before making a permanent financial decision on an incomplete record.

Warning signs include unexplained transfers between accounts, gaps in account history, income figures that conflict with tax returns or pay records, lifestyle spending that doesn’t match reported income, and missing documents for a business or retirement plan. One isolated issue may have a simple explanation. Several unresolved discrepancies make it difficult to evaluate any proposed agreement fairly.

Steps that can help clarify the record:

• Make a written request: Identify the specific document, account period, or explanation needed rather than making a broad request for all financial information.
• Use a shared document list: Track what has been provided, what remains outstanding, and the date each item was requested.
• Pause unresolved negotiations: Don’t finalize terms tied to an unknown value, income figure, or debt balance.
• Seek independent advice: An attorney or appropriate financial professional can help assess whether the available records support a proposed settlement.
• Consider formal procedures: If voluntary exchange breaks down, the available next steps depend on the posture of the case, Maryland procedure, and whether a court order or signed agreement is already in place.

Mediation is voluntary problem-solving, not a replacement for every tool available in a contested divorce. If disclosure concerns affect the decision to continue negotiating, request more documentation, or move toward a formal court process, we can walk you through what that looks like under Maryland law.

How Disclosure Supports a Maryland Separation Agreement

A separation agreement sets out the financial terms spouses intend to follow before and after divorce, addressing marital property, real estate, retirement accounts, debt allocation, alimony, child support, insurance, and other future obligations. Every major term should rest on a known financial assumption.

If one spouse keeps the home, the agreement should reflect the mortgage balance, who will pay carrying costs, how any refinancing will be handled, and the value used in the negotiation. If retirement accounts are divided, both parties should understand the balances, valuation date, and possible tax effects before signing. Child support guidelines rely on income and other relevant information, so outdated or incomplete records can skew the calculation. Alimony discussions depend on each spouse’s income, expenses, earning capacity, and financial circumstances. Financial disclosure gives those conversations a factual basis instead of leaving crucial terms to estimates.

Attorney review is a separate protection from mediation itself. A mediator remains neutral; an attorney can advise one spouse about proposed terms, missing records, property classification, and the legal consequences of signing a separation agreement. Those are different functions, and both matter.

Build the Agreement on Reliable Information

Mediation works best when both spouses have time to gather records, ask focused questions, and review the financial assumptions behind every major decision. A complete picture won’t make every issue easy, but it gives the conversation a reliable place to start and gives any agreement reached a much stronger foundation.

When disclosure questions affect property division, support, or a separation agreement in Maryland, our team at Law Office of Shelly Maynard Ingram can provide practical guidance based on your circumstances. Contact us at (240) 652-2596">(240) 652-2596 to discuss divorce mediation and family law concerns.

An equity award held in one spouse’s name isn’t automatically separate property, and an award that hasn’t vested isn’t automatically worth zero. In Maryland divorce cases, stock options can be marital property when they represent compensation earned during the marriage, even if the employee can’t exercise them yet. The harder questions aren’t whether an award exists. They’re what work it compensates, what portion was earned during the marriage, what restrictions apply, and how to divide an uncertain future benefit without treating it like cash already in the bank. At Law Office of Shelly Maynard Ingram, we help clients work through these financial questions in plain terms while building a practical strategy for property division.

When Stock Options May Be Marital Property in Maryland

Maryland equitable distribution starts with classification. Marital property generally includes property acquired during the marriage, regardless of whose name appears on the account, title, grant notice, or employment records. Property acquired before marriage, inherited by one spouse, or received as an individual gift may be excluded unless it was converted into marital property.

That definition matters because equity compensation often arrives in stages. An employer may issue a grant during the marriage, require continued employment for several years, and allow exercise only after a future vesting date. The employee spouse may hold the award alone, but title doesn’t settle whether the benefit has a marital component.

A grant made before the marriage may contain a nonmarital component, while an award granted during the marriage may be partly or fully marital. A grant issued after the spouses separate can still require careful review because separation doesn’t itself end a Maryland marriage. The date of the final divorce decree is generally more significant than the date one spouse moves out.

Courts also examine why the employer gave the award. It may reward work already completed, encourage the employee to remain with the company, compensate for future performance, or serve several purposes at once. Those facts affect how much of the award belongs in the marital property analysis.

Maryland appellate decisions, including Green v. Green, recognize that an unvested and unexercised option can be a property interest rather than something the court must ignore. That doesn’t mean every unvested award will be divided the same way. A future benefit tied entirely to work performed after the marriage may have little or no marital portion, while an award that compensates past work performed during the marriage presents a different issue entirely.

How Maryland Determines the Marital Portion

Identifying an award as marital property is only the first step. The next is allocating the portion of the eventual benefit that was earned during the marriage. Maryland courts have addressed this through decisions including Otley v. Otley and Chimes v. Michael, which support a fact-based approach that considers the award’s terms and the employment period it covers rather than relying on a single date or label.

The Coverture Fraction

A coverture fraction (sometimes called a time rule calculation) compares the time the employee earned the award during the marriage with the full period used to earn it. The relevant period might run from the grant date to the vesting date, but the correct dates depend on the employer’s plan documents and the purpose of the grant. A four-year vesting schedule may look straightforward until the grant agreement shows that part of the award replaced a prior bonus or was issued to retain the employee through a specific future date.

Questions that matter in allocation:

• What Work Does the Award Compensate? Review whether the employer describes it as payment for past performance, future service, retention, or a combination of purposes.
• When Was the Award Earned? Compare the relevant earning period with the dates of the marriage.
• What Can Cause Forfeiture? Determine whether resignation, termination, retirement, or failure to meet a performance condition eliminates the benefit.
• What Happens After Vesting? Identify exercise windows, expiration dates, sale restrictions, and any employer control over settlement.

How Stock Options Can Be Valued & Divided

Value and division are separate questions. An option’s apparent value can shift with the current share price, the exercise price, the time left before expiration, vesting uncertainty, and the risk that the employee loses the award before it can be exercised. An option with an exercise price above the market price may have no immediate exercise value, even though it could gain value later.

Taxes and liquidity matter too. Exercising options can create taxable income, and shares received through exercise may be difficult or unwise to sell immediately because of employer trading windows, securities law restrictions, or concentrated stock risk. Any proposed division should address after-tax value rather than assuming that every reported account figure is cash available for distribution.

Present Value or Asset Offset

One approach is to estimate the marital portion’s present value and account for it through a monetary award, which is a payment ordered to adjust the parties’ respective interests in marital property. The employee spouse keeps the equity award while the other spouse receives a larger share of another marital asset, such as available cash or retirement funds. This can provide a cleaner financial break, but it depends on a supportable valuation and sufficient assets to create an offset. It becomes difficult when an award is far from vesting, highly volatile, or subject to substantial forfeiture risk.

If, As & When Distribution

An if, as, and when distribution means the nonemployee spouse receives an agreed or ordered share only if, as, and when the employee actually receives value from the award. Otley v. Otley is often cited in connection with this approach. It avoids assigning a fixed present value to an uncertain benefit, but the agreement or order must clearly address notice, exercise decisions, taxes, withholding, transaction costs, and payment timing. Maryland courts may use a monetary award and, in appropriate circumstances, transfer an interest in qualifying deferred compensation assets as part of equitable distribution. What’s available in a particular case depends on the asset type, applicable law, and the employer plan’s terms.

RSUs & Other Equity Compensation in Divorce

Stock options are only one form of equity compensation. Restricted stock units, commonly called RSUs, are a promise to deliver shares or their cash value after the recipient meets vesting conditions. Unlike an option, an RSU generally doesn’t require the employee to pay an exercise price to receive the underlying shares. Restricted stock, employee stock purchase plans, performance shares, deferred compensation, and cash-based long-term incentive awards each require their own analysis. The name of the program isn’t enough. The grant agreement may reveal that an award settles in cash, that vesting depends on company performance, or that the employer can cancel unvested units after certain employment events.

Practical differences among equity awards:

• Stock Options: Give the employee a right to buy shares at a stated exercise price before expiration.
• Restricted Stock Units: Usually deliver shares or cash after vesting, without an exercise price payment.
• Restricted Stock: Involves actual shares that may be subject to forfeiture or transfer restrictions.
• Employee Stock Purchase Plans: May allow periodic purchases at a discount, making purchase dates and payroll contributions important.
• Deferred Compensation: Defers payment of earned compensation to a later date under plan-specific distribution rules.

Documents & Questions to Resolve Before Settlement

A fair analysis starts with complete disclosure. A year-end brokerage statement may show only the shares currently held, not unvested awards, cancelled grants, exercise prices, or future vesting conditions. Both spouses need enough information to test a proposed classification and value.

For Columbia residents, divorce and domestic cases proceed through the Circuit Court for Howard County. The local court handles the case, but Maryland statutes and appellate decisions control the substantive rules for marital property analysis.

Records to gather:

• Grant Notices & Award Agreements: Identify the grant date, award type, exercise price, vesting conditions, and forfeiture provisions.
• Plan Documents & Amendments: Explain the employer’s governing rules for settlement, transfer, taxes, and termination of employment.
• Vesting Schedules & Account Statements: Show what has vested, what remains unvested, and when future tranches may become available.
• Exercise Records & Sale Confirmations: Document prior exercises, sales, proceeds, and transaction costs.
• Pay Records & Employer Correspondence: Help establish the award’s purpose and whether it was connected to past or future employment.
• Tax Returns, W-2 Forms, & Tax Statements: Help evaluate withholding, income recognition, capital gains, and the actual after-tax benefit.

Before accepting a settlement, confirm that the proposal identifies each outstanding award, separates the marital and nonmarital portions, accounts for taxes and forfeiture risk, and explains what happens if an award vests after divorce. The central question isn’t merely whether stock options exist. It’s what portion was earned during the marriage and how to divide it without overlooking plan restrictions, risk, or tax consequences.

At Law Office of Shelly Maynard Ingram, we can review equity compensation issues, explain the available paths, and pursue negotiation, mediation, or litigation when appropriate. To discuss a Maryland divorce matter involving stock options or other equity compensation, contact us at (240) 652-2596">(240) 652-2596.

Owning a company before marriage doesn’t automatically settle every question about its future value, income, or control. A prenuptial agreement for Maryland business owners can identify what each person brings to the marriage and establish a clear framework before business growth and marital finances become intertwined. Before the lines blur and the stakes rise, that clarity matters.

Maryland Family Law Article 8, Section 101 allows spouses to make enforceable agreements covering property rights, alimony, support, and personal rights. For a business owner, the useful work is in the details: naming the company, disclosing its financial position, and addressing the situations most likely to create disagreement later.

Why Business Owners Consider a Prenup

A prenuptial agreement can do more than label a company as separate property. It can address ownership interests, business debts, distributions, compensation, future ventures, and how the parties intend to treat growth in value during the marriage.

A business formed before marriage may start as separate property (property acquired before the marriage or otherwise excluded from marital property). That starting point matters, but it doesn’t end the analysis if marital funds are later invested in the company, a spouse contributes labor to its growth, or business and household finances get mixed together. Maryland’s equitable distribution process gives courts the authority to make a monetary award after identifying and valuing marital property, and a premarital agreement can clarify how the parties intend to treat a business interest. Vague language stating that all business assets belong to one spouse won’t hold up under scrutiny.

Control can be as important as value. An agreement may address whether a nonowner spouse can seek an ownership interest, whether a divorce-related payment must come from assets outside the company, and how the parties will approach transfers or buyout issues without disrupting operations.

How Maryland Courts Evaluate Prenuptial Agreements

Maryland Family Law Article 8, Section 101 provides the statutory authority for agreements involving property rights and support, but enforceability depends on more than including the right language. Courts evaluate premarital agreements through contract principles and the circumstances surrounding negotiation, disclosure, and signing.

In Cannon v. Cannon, Maryland’s highest court recognized that engaged people entering a premarital agreement stand in a confidential relationship, one where each party has heightened reason to trust the other. The court identified financial disclosure, voluntariness, fairness, independent legal advice, and burden of proof as key issues when an agreement is challenged.

No single step automatically makes an agreement enforceable. A meaningful opportunity for each person to review the terms, obtain independent counsel, ask questions, negotiate changes, and sign well before the wedding creates a cleaner record that the decision was informed and voluntary.

Business Interests a Prenup Should Address

A prenuptial agreement should identify the company with enough precision that there’s no later uncertainty about what was being discussed. That usually means naming the entity, stating the owner’s percentage interest, identifying the formation date, and noting known debts and current ownership rights. The document should also separate the ownership interest from the economic questions that follow it. A spouse might retain full control of an LLC while disputes still arise over salary, distributions, reinvested profits, appreciation in value, or contributions made with marital income.

Business details worth addressing:

• Entity Structure: Identify whether the interest is in an LLC, corporation, partnership, professional practice, or family business.
• Ownership Rights: Review transfer restrictions, voting rights, buyout and sale provisions, and terms in an LLC operating agreement or shareholder agreement.
• Value Growth: State how the parties intend to treat appreciation in value, whether from market conditions, reinvestment, or either spouse’s efforts.
• Income and Distributions: Distinguish business distributions from wages, bonuses, retained earnings, and funds used for household expenses.
• Future Ventures: Consider whether a later company, acquired interest, or reorganized entity requires separate treatment.

Generic asset language misses important distinctions. A family business may involve succession expectations and transfer restrictions, while a professional practice may carry licensing, compensation, goodwill, and partnership considerations that require closer attention.

Preparing Financial Disclosure & Valuation Records

Financial disclosure means giving the other party a meaningful picture of your assets, debts, and income before signing. For a business owner, a disclosure schedule should separate personal finances from company finances while showing how the business contributes to the owner’s overall financial position.

Useful records to gather:

• Tax Records: Recent personal and business tax returns, including schedules that show pass-through income.
• Financial Statements: Balance sheets, profit and loss statements, cash flow records, and current debt information.
• Ownership Documents: Articles of organization, stock records, capitalization tables, operating agreements, partnership agreements, and ownership schedules.
• Valuation Materials: A recent business valuation, appraisal materials, sale offers, or records supporting an approximate current value.
• Personal Financial Information: Bank accounts, real estate, retirement assets, liabilities, and other income sources.

A business valuation documents the company’s starting position before marriage, though future value will shift with market conditions, new capital, business decisions, personal labor, and the use of marital resources. Clear disclosure gives both parties a real basis for negotiation and heads off a common problem: an agreement that lists a company but provides no understandable information about its value, debt, income, or governing documents.

When a Postnuptial Agreement May Be Relevant

A postnuptial agreement is made after marriage, and it can be appropriate when a couple marries before completing a prenup, when one spouse acquires a business during the marriage, or when an existing company is sold, reorganized, or materially changes. The same practical concerns apply: full financial disclosure, voluntary participation, time to review the terms, and independent legal advice all matter when spouses are making decisions about property and financial rights.

Revisiting the plan after a major ownership or financial change is often more practical than relying on broad language written years earlier.

Plan Before Business & Marriage Finances Overlap

The strongest planning opportunity comes before a dispute requires anyone to reconstruct years of records, contributions, and business decisions. A well-drafted agreement creates clarity without treating marriage as a transaction, because both parties understand the financial expectations before making legal commitments.

We provide practical guidance on prenuptial and postnuptial agreements for Maryland business owners, with close attention to business assets and clear communication throughout the process. To discuss your circumstances, contact Law Office of Shelly Maynard Ingram at (240) 652-2596">(240) 652-2596.

Most business owners facing divorce assume the worst: a judge orders the company sold, or hands the other spouse a percentage of ownership. That fear is understandable, but it reflects how other states handle property division, not Maryland. The way Maryland law actually works gives business owners more options than they expect, and more exposure than they might want to admit.

Vague warnings about “complexity” don’t help you make decisions. The mechanics do. What follows explains how Maryland courts classify a business, how appraisers determine its value, and what a court can actually order once that number exists.

How Maryland Law Classifies a Business as Marital or Non-Marital Property

Under Maryland Family Law section 8-201, marital property includes all property acquired by either spouse during the marriage, regardless of whose name appears on the title or operating agreement. That broad definition means a business formed after the wedding is presumptively marital, even if only one spouse ever worked in it.

Businesses started before the marriage are more complicated. The company itself may be non-marital property, but the growth it experienced during the marriage may not be. Maryland courts distinguish between active appreciation and passive appreciation when tracing value. Active appreciation (growth resulting from either spouse’s efforts during the marriage) is generally treated as marital. Passive appreciation, meaning gains driven by market forces unrelated to either spouse’s involvement, may be treated differently. In practice, tracing which portion of a business’s increased value is active versus passive requires financial records going back to the marriage date and often the testimony of a forensic accountant.

The Three Valuation Methods & Maryland’s Fair Market Value Standard

Maryland courts use fair market value as the legal standard for business valuation. The definition matters: fair market value is the price at which a business would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, with neither party under compulsion to complete the transaction. That standard shapes which valuation method makes sense for a given business.

Appraisers typically apply one of three approaches, and the choice significantly affects the final number:

• Income approach: The appraiser normalizes the business’s historical earnings by removing one-time anomalies and owner-benefit expenses, then projects sustainable future cash flow and discounts it to a present value. This method is the most common for professional practices and service businesses.
• Market approach: The appraiser compares the business to recent sales of similar companies in the same industry, applying revenue or earnings multiples from those transactions. This works best when comparable sales data actually exists.
• Asset approach: The appraiser calculates net asset value, meaning total assets minus total liabilities. This method is typically reserved for asset-heavy companies or businesses with little ongoing earning power.

Each method can produce a materially different number. When spouses retain competing appraisers, the court weighs both reports and decides which methodology, or which blend, reflects fair market value under the circumstances.

Why Goodwill Is the Most Contested Piece of Any Business Valuation

Goodwill is the portion of a business’s value that exceeds its tangible assets. It can represent customer relationships, brand recognition, a trained workforce, or the owner’s professional reputation. Not all goodwill is treated the same way in a Maryland divorce.

Maryland case law, beginning with Prahinski v. Prahinski and developed through subsequent decisions, establishes that goodwill qualifies as marital property only when it has value independent of a specific individual’s continued presence or personal reputation. That body of law gives rise to the distinction between enterprise goodwill and personal goodwill. Enterprise goodwill is built into the systems, contracts, client base, and brand of the business itself. It survives a change in ownership and is therefore marital property subject to equitable distribution. Personal goodwill is tied to one spouse’s individual reputation, relationships, or skills in a way that wouldn’t transfer to a buyer, and that portion is generally non-marital.

A related issue that doesn’t get enough attention is the double-dipping problem. Double dipping happens when the same stream of business income is used twice: once during the income approach to set the business’s value, and again when the court calculates alimony based on that same owner-spouse’s income. The risk is real in cases involving professional practices, where business value and personal earning capacity are difficult to separate. Identifying this issue early changes how both the valuation and the support analysis should be framed.

Why the Court Can’t Simply Award Half the Business

Even when both parties agree that a business has significant marital value, the court doesn’t have authority to transfer ownership the way most people assume. Under Maryland Family Law section 8-205, the property a court can directly transfer between spouses is limited to pension, retirement, profit-sharing, and deferred compensation plans; family-use personal property; and real property jointly owned by the parties that was used as their principal residence. A privately held business isn’t on that list.

Because title to a business can’t be transferred by court order, the judge instead grants a monetary award to the non-owner spouse representing their marital share of the business’s value, paid in cash rather than through an ownership stake. The owner spouse can fund that award through a lump-sum payment, by giving up other marital assets of equivalent value, or through a structured buyout paid over time. Courts strongly prefer to avoid ordering the sale of a functioning business. A forced sale under litigation pressure rarely produces fair market value, and it destroys something both spouses may have a financial interest in preserving. Negotiated buyouts, whether paid at closing or spread across several years, are the more common resolution because they protect the business’s going-concern value while giving the non-owner spouse what the law entitles them to receive.

What the Valuation Process Actually Requires From You

The valuation process involves financial disclosure requirements that apply to both spouses. Maryland courts require each party to file a financial statement and participate in a joint marital and non-marital property statement cataloging assets and their claimed classification. For a business owner, the accuracy of those filings matters as much as the appraisal itself.

One area draws particular scrutiny: add-backs. An add-back occurs when the appraiser identifies expenses run through the business that appear to benefit the owner personally, then adds those amounts back to the normalized earnings figure. Vehicle allowances, personal travel, and meals lacking a legitimate business purpose are common examples. Adding them back raises the normalized income figure, which raises the value produced by the income approach. Business owners who don’t anticipate this scrutiny are often surprised by how much those routine deductions affect the final number.

For Columbia residents, valuation disputes that can’t be resolved by agreement are decided in the Circuit Court for Howard County in Ellicott City, which handles contested property division as part of its family law docket. Knowing which court governs your case affects how financial disclosures are formatted, what the local pretrial process looks like, and how contested financial issues are typically managed before a hearing.

Building a Strategy Around Your Specific Ownership Structure

The number produced by the valuation process sets the baseline for everything that follows: the monetary award, the offset negotiations, and the structure of any buyout agreement. That number isn’t fixed until someone builds the analytical framework around it. The framework depends on which valuation method applies, how goodwill is categorized, whether an add-back argument is viable, and whether a double-dipping risk exists in the alimony analysis.

Engaging a qualified valuation professional early, before positions harden, changes negotiating leverage in ways that waiting until litigation cannot recover. At Law Office of Shelly Maynard Ingram, we work with business owners and their spouses to build a legal strategy around the actual ownership structure and financial facts of each case. If you’re approaching a divorce that involves a business, reach out to us at (240) 652-2596">(240) 652-2596 to talk through where your situation stands.

Most parents planning a relocation think about one deadline: the custody notice period. What they often miss is that a second clock is already running. Howard County Public Schools has its own enrollment and reassignment rules, and those rules don’t pause while a custody dispute works its way through the Circuit Court. When a move falls close to the start of a school year or mid-year, the two timelines collide in ways that can force a rushed court appearance, a tuition assessment, or an enrollment gap for a child who has done nothing wrong.

Maryland’s relocation statute and the Howard County Public School System’s residency policy are separate legal instruments. They don’t cross-reference each other, and most custody orders don’t address them together. Understanding both before a move happens, rather than after, is what separates a manageable transition from an expensive emergency filing.

Founding attorney Shelly M. Ingram is a member of the Bar Association of Howard County and the Howard County Collaborative Professionals. At Law Office of Shelly Maynard Ingram, we work with Columbia-area parents on exactly this kind of layered problem, where the legal question and the practical school question have to be answered at the same time.

How Maryland’s 90-Day Relocation Notice Requirement Works

Family Law § 9-106 allows any custody or visitation order to require at least 90 days of advance written notice before a parent relocates the child’s permanent residence, whether that move is across Howard County or across the country. The notice requirement isn’t automatic. It must be written into the order. But when it is, a parent who skips or shortens it is in contempt before the move even happens.

There are two recognized exceptions. A court can waive the requirement if notice would expose the child or a party to abuse as defined under Family Law § 4-501, or for other good cause shown. Outside those narrow circumstances, the 90-day window is the rule.

The non-moving parent’s response window matters just as much. Filing a petition within 20 days of receiving notice, or filing any petition where the proposed move would significantly interfere with the existing parenting time schedule, requires the court to set an expedited hearing. That compressed timeline is one reason it’s worth having a plan ready before notice goes out, not after the 20-day clock starts.

When a Proposed Move Triggers a Custody Modification

Maryland amended its custody modification statute effective October 1, 2025. Under Family Law § 9-202, a parent’s proposal to relocate in a way that would make physical custody impracticable constitutes a material change in circumstances. The 2025 legislation codifies this standard expressly in statute, giving courts and parents a clearer framework in relocation cases.

Reaching that threshold doesn’t decide anything by itself. The companion statute, Family Law § 9-201, sets out 16 factors a judge must weigh and articulate on the record before modifying an order. Those factors include the location of each parent’s home as it relates to coordinating parenting time, school, and activities. A court won’t approve a relocation simply because the moving parent has a legitimate reason to go. The question is always whether the proposed arrangement, after the move, still serves the child’s best interest.

Maryland’s Court of Appeals addressed this directly in Domingues v. Johnson, holding that relocation can be a material change in circumstances but doesn’t automatically shift custody to the non-moving parent. Each case turns on its own facts. A parent who believes the other party’s move should prompt a custody change still has to build that argument from the 16-factor framework, not from the move alone.

Legal Custody, Physical Custody, & Who Decides on a New School

Physical custody determines where a child sleeps. Legal custody determines who makes decisions about the child’s life, including which school the child attends. Those two things don’t always travel together, and confusing them is one of the most common mistakes parents make when a move triggers a school enrollment question.

Joint Legal Custody Without a Tie-Breaker

Under joint legal custody without a tie-breaking provision, neither parent can enroll or transfer the child unilaterally. If the parents disagree about a new school, the dispute goes to mediation, a parent coordinator, or a circuit court motion. The Circuit Court for Howard County orders two two-hour mediation sessions in most contested custody and visitation cases unless domestic violence allegations are present, and offers parent coordination when both parents consent. That process takes time a school registration deadline won’t wait for.

Tie-Breaking Provisions Are Narrower Than They Look

Some orders give one parent tie-breaking authority over a specific decision category, such as education. That provision covers education decisions, and only education decisions. It doesn’t carry over to medical decisions, extracurricular activities, or any other category. The exact wording of the order controls. A parent who assumes a tie-breaker in one area gives them broader authority is reading the order wrong, and a court will correct that assumption.

What Relocation Means for School Enrollment in Howard County

HCPSS Policy 9000 defines a resident student in a joint or shared custody arrangement as a child whose bona fide residence follows either parent’s Howard County address. If one parent moves within Howard County and that parent has joint or shared custody under a court order, the child remains eligible to enroll as a resident student based on that parent’s address. The policy doesn’t require the child to live exclusively at that address.

Families are required to report any change of address to the child’s current school within 10 school business days of a move, whether the move stays within the same attendance area, shifts to a different Howard County zone, or leaves the county altogether. A parent who moves out of the child’s current attendance area mid-year can request a relocation-category reassignment to allow the child to finish the school year at the same school. That option exists, but it isn’t guaranteed by the district’s policy. A move out of Howard County entirely typically triggers a tuition assessment. The child can continue attending only if the family pays out-of-county tuition, a cost most parents don’t anticipate when they’re focused on the custody notice deadline.

Building a Relocation & School Plan That Holds Up

Most parenting plans don’t specify which parent’s address governs school enrollment when the parents live in different attendance areas or different counties. That silence becomes a real problem when a move happens. A school enrollment clause doesn’t have to be complicated: it names a designated address for enrollment purposes, identifies who has authority to sign enrollment forms, and describes the process for changing that designation if circumstances shift. Written into the order, that language closes a gap that most standard custody provisions leave open.

Documentation matters equally when a school-year deadline forces a move into an expedited hearing. Three things carry concrete weight with a court: written notice sent by certified mail, completed HCPSS enrollment or reassignment paperwork, and a dated record of communications between the parents about the move and the school. A parent who has all three is in a materially different position than one who moved first and tried to explain later.

What to Do Before the Deadlines Converge

The parents most likely to end up in an emergency custody hearing are the ones who treated the relocation notice and the school enrollment question as two separate problems to solve in sequence. They’re not. The 90-day notice period, the school district’s 10-business-day address reporting requirement, the October 1, 2025 material change statute, and HCPSS Policy 9000’s residency rules all interact. A move planned without accounting for all four can become a contempt motion, a tuition bill, or a modification petition before the boxes are even unpacked.

Parents anticipating or opposing a relocation should also think carefully about what their current order actually says about legal custody and tie-breaking authority. An order that grants joint legal custody without specifying who breaks ties on school enrollment puts both parents in a weaker position when a disagreement arises, regardless of who is moving.

Relocation and school enrollment are two separate legal questions that have to be answered together. We work with parents in Columbia and across Howard County on both sides of this issue, and Shelly M. Ingram’s standing in the local legal community means we understand how these cases move through the Circuit Court for Howard County. If a move is on the horizon, reach out to us at (240) 652-2596">(240) 652-2596 before the calendar forces your hand.

Alimony is a payment made by a higher-earning spouse to a lower-earning spouse during and after divorce to ensure that the financial needs of the economically dependent person are met while he or she works to become self-supporting. Alimony isn’t always set in stone. Under Maryland law, either spouse can request a modification of alimony (such that the amount of monthly payments can go up, down, or terminate all together) under certain circumstances. Whether you are paying alimony or receiving alimony, it’s important to understand when alimony can be modified and how to pursue a modification when needed.

Key Takeaways

• To modify an existing alimony order, you must demonstrate a material change in financial circumstances.
• If a divorce decree specifically states that alimony is non-modifiable, the court cannot change the amount or duration of alimony, even if there has been a material change in financial changes.
• Alimony modifications do not always need to go to court. Alimony can be modified outside of court using alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation, negotiation, and the collaborative process.

What is an Alimony Modification?

An alimony modification refers to the legal process of changing a current spousal support order. Generally, unless the settlement agreement specifically states that alimony is “non-modifiable,” an alimony order can be modified when there has been a material change in financial circumstances after divorce. A minor or temporary change in financial circumstances is unlikely to qualify. However, the court may consider an increase or decrease in payments if there has been a significant and ongoing change.

Non-Modifiable Alimony

There are certain situations in which alimony cannot be modified. If the divorce decree specifies that alimony is “non-modifiable,” the court cannot change the amount or the duration. In such cases, alimony will remain unchanged, regardless of any financial change of circumstances or future events.

When Can You Obtain an Alimony Modification?

To modify an existing alimony order in Maryland, you must show that there has been a material change in financial circumstances. Critically, the change must be significant, involuntary, and unforeseen at the time the original order was issued. Courts usually consider at least a 25% change in income to constitute a “material” change. Voluntary actions, such as quitting a job, often will not qualify as grounds for modification.

Some common reasons a court would modify an alimony order can include the following:

• Involuntary job loss: if the paying spouse loses his or her job involuntarily.
• Serious health issues: if a spouse suffers a serious illness or disability that prevents him or her from working.
• Significant shift in income: if there is a substantial increase in the recipient spouse’s income or a decrease in financial needs, a court may decrease or terminate alimony payments.
• Cohabitation: remarriage of the recipient will terminate alimony in Maryland. At times, the cohabitation of an alimony recipient may be grounds for alimony reduction or termination - if the cohabitation significantly changes the recipient’s financial need.

Notably, a party’s retirement can also be considered a material change in circumstances, if the retirement was not taken into consideration during divorce negotiations. For instance, if the paying spouse’s retirement is due to medical reasons, a court may reduce alimony or terminate it altogether. But if the retirement is voluntary, a judge might be less inclined to grant a downward modification. While every case has its own unique set of facts and circumstances, the court is required to evaluate certain statutory factors when determining if alimony, or an alimony modification is appropriate.

What is the Court Process for Modifying Alimony in Maryland?

To obtain an alimony modification, you must file a petition in court and serve the other party with notice of your request to modify alimony. The court will then schedule a hearing where both parties can present testimony, evidence, and argument regarding the merit of the modification of alimony request. Evidence can include financial records, medical reports, documentation of employment, and any other relevant information.

Former spouses can modify alimony without the need for litigation. An oral agreement to modify alimony is not legally binding. For an order to modify alimony to be legally enforceable, it must be in writing, and signed by both parties as well as a judge.

Alternatives to Litigating an Alimony Modification

An alimony modification does not have to be litigated in the courtroom and out-of-court alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods such as mediation, negotiation, or the collaborative process should always be considered. Rather than being bound to the court’s rigid criteria, parties can find creative solutions using one of these out-of-court processes. Out-of-court settlement is often faster and more cost-effective than litigation and can allow the parties to confidentially discuss their financial needs without subjecting themselves to the adversarial courtroom environment.

Contact an Experienced Maryland Alimony Attorney

If you are considering requesting an alimony modification or have been served with a petition for alimony, it’s critical to have the legal guidance you need. At the Law Office of Shelly M. Ingram, our Fulton, Maryland divorce and family law attorneys provide trusted representation for a wide range of divorce and family law matters, including those involving alimony modifications. Our attorneys are trained in collaborative divorce, mediation, and traditional divorce litigation. To schedule a confidential consultation, call us at (240) 652-2596 or contact us online.

Although some marriages can be ended amicably and swiftly between the parties, other divorce cases take months, or even years, to resolve. During the time a divorce case is pending in court, a lower-earning spouse might be at a financial disadvantage, or a parent may need a formal custody arrangement in writing for the stability of children. In such instances, temporary orders can be established to address these time-sensitive issues while you continue to work towards settlement.

Key Takeaways

• Temporary orders, sometimes known as pendente lite orders, are court orders issued before a final judgment is rendered. These orders help to maintain financial status quo, address immediate family needs, and ensure stability for children.
• Temporary orders in Maryland divorce can address critical issues such as temporary spousal support, pendente lite child support, child custody, use and possession of a family home, and domestic violence.
• Once a temporary order has been established, it is binding upon both parties until permanent orders are entered.

What is a Temporary Order in Divorce?

Sometimes referred to as a pendente lite order, a temporary order in a Maryland divorce is a court order that is issued before a final decree is entered. These temporary orders are meant to maintain status quo and address the immediate needs of a party while the case is ongoing. When the divorce case has been finalized, and temporary orders are replaced by those in the final judgment.

Types of Temporary Orders in Maryland Divorce

There are several types of temporary orders that can be useful to families in a Maryland divorce. For instance, parties may need to address financial support or child custody and access. There may be questions concerning the use of shared vehicles or which spouse gets to remain in the house. Temporary orders can address these issues and many others.

Some common temporary orders in Maryland divorce include the following:

• Temporary child support: Often referred to as pendente lite child support, temporary child support provides immediate financial assistance for children while a divorce case is pending. Temporary child support will ensure that a child’s basic needs are met before the final decree is issued. As with permanent child support, temporary child support is based upon parental income, the number of children, and overnight access.
• Use and possession: A temporary use and possession order grants one spouse the exclusive rights to live in a family home and use assets (such as vehicles) during divorce proceedings. Temporary use and possession orders are typically put in place to ensure stability for children and are generally used when parents are unable to continue to live together while litigation is pending.
• Pendente lite alimony: Pendente lite alimony, also referred to as temporary spousal support, can be ordered to maintain financial status quo for an economically dependent spouse. It helps ensure that a spouse that earns less is able to pay bills and cover essential expenses when a divorce is pending.
• Temporary child custody: A parent can file to establish temporary or pendente lite child custody when a divorce case is first filed. Temporary custody orders can address legal and physical care for a child, and define parenting time while divorce proceedings are ongoing. If parents cannot reach agreement on temporary custody, the Court will render a decision based on the “best interests of the child.”

Other temporary orders may address debt management and financial restraints. A court may also specifically order a higher-earning spouse to pay “suit money” to the lower-earning spouse so he or she can afford to hire or compensate an attorney.

Temporary protective orders can also be issued in cases where domestic violence has occurred to provide immediate relief during the initial stages of a divorce. Importantly, you do not have to wait until your divorce case has concluded to obtain a protective order. After a temporary order has been obtained and served on the respondent, the court will schedule a final protective order hearing within seven days. Both parties will be given the opportunity to present evidence and testimony. If a judge determines a permanent protective order is necessary, it may remain in effect for up to two years in certain situations.

How Do You Obtain a Temporary Order?

Temporary protective orders under the domestic violence statute should not be confused with an automatic restraining orders that prevent a spouse from disposing of financial assets. To obtain any temporary order in Maryland, you must file paperwork with the court to request the specific relief you seek. A request for temporary relief can be filed when you first file for divorce or while the case is ongoing. Your spouse must be served a copy of the motion you filed to request temporary relief to ensure that he or she is informed of your request. The court will then schedule a hearing on your request where a judge will evaluate the testimony and all relevant evidence to render a determination.

Once a temporary order has gone into effect, it is binding on both parties. If either party violates the temporary order, then he or she can be held in contempt of court and face various penalties. A judge may also order a person that violates a court order to pay attorney fees incurred by the person that seeks to enforce the court’s order.

Contact an Experienced Maryland Divorce Attorney

If you are facing divorce, it’s important to understand the types of temporary orders that may be available to you. At the Law Office of Shelly M. Ingram, our Fulton, Maryland divorce and family law attorneys are dedicated to providing reliable representation for divorce and a wide range of family law matters. We will work diligently to ensure the necessary orders are in place as court proceedings are ongoing. Our attorneys are trained in collaborative divorce, mediation, and traditional divorce litigation. To schedule a confidential consultation, call us at (240) 652-2596 or contact us online.

The new Maryland child custody legislation, primarily House Bill 1191 (now codified as Family Law § 9-201 and § 9-202), went into effect on October 1, 2025, has a significant impact on custody cases. Specifically, the new law formalizes the "best interests of the child" standard, emphasizes co-parenting, and promotes judicial transparency in child custody decision-making. Judges are now required to evaluate a number of statutory factors when determining custody matters, rather than rely on interpretations of the factors pulled from case law. While the new law will help to ensure more consistent judicial decisions, parents will still have the greatest certainty to know how their case will be determined when they make these decisions out-of-court.

Key Takeaways

• The new Maryland child custody law formalizes the “best interests of the child standard” by requiring judges to evaluate specific statutory factors related to the child’s stability and needs.
• Judges must articulate how each statutory factor applies to the case, increasing judicial transparency and reducing reliance on case law.
• A primary factor that courts must consider is cooperation and communication between coparents. Parents must be able to communicate effectively and reach shared decisions.
• The new law more clearly defines what constitutes a “material change in circumstances” for the purposes of modifying existing custody orders.

Codification of the "Best Interest" Factors

The Maryland child custody laws now require judges to examine a variety of factors related to the child’s day-to-day needs, stability, welfare, and a parents’ ability to effectively co-parent. While many of these factors are addressed in the case law courts have long relied upon in determining custody issues, courts are now required to consider them and articulate how each factor applies in making a determination in a custody case. The factors in the new statutory framework are as follows:

• The stability and foreseeable health and welfare of the child;
• Frequent, regular, and continuing contact with parents who can act in the child’s best interests;
• Whether and how parents who do not live together will share the rights and responsibilities of raising the child
• The child’s relationship with each parent, siblings, relatives, and other individuals important in the child’s life;
• The child’s physical and emotional security, and protection from exposure to conflict and violence;
• The child’s developmental needs, including physical safety, emotional security, positive self-image, interpersonal skills, and intellectual and cognitive growth;
• The daily needs of the child, including education, socialization, culture and religion, food, shelter, clothing, and mental and physical health;
• How to place the needs above those of the parents, protect the child from parental conflict, maintain the child’s relationships with parents, siblings, and relatives;
• The child’s age;
• Any military deployment of a parent and its effect, if any, on the parent-child relationship;
• Any prior court orders or agreements;
• Each parent’s role and tasks related to the child;
• The location of each parent’s home in connection with their ability to coordinate parenting time, school, and activities;
• The parents’ co-parenting relationship with each other;
• The child’s preference, if age-appropriate.

Judges may also consider any other factors they consider appropriate in determining how best to serve the physical, emotional, and developmental needs of the child.

Emphasis on Parental Communication and Co-Parenting

As a result of Maryland’s child custody law shift, cooperation between co-parents is now a primary factor that courts must consider when deciding custody cases. Parents should be able to reach shared decisions and communicate effectively regarding their child’s needs, scheduling, health, education, and well-being. A demonstrated inability to communicate or a history of high conflict between parents can significantly impact the outcome of a custody matter.

Judicial Accountability and Transparency

In accordance with the new Maryland child custody laws, judges are now required to articulate their reasoning on the record for each of the statutory factors. This helps to eliminate inconsistent results in connection with the reliance on case law and promotes uniformity across different jurisdictions in the state. The once subjective standards are now replaced with more rigid guidelines.

Clarification on Modifying Existing Orders

The new Maryland child custody law also more clearly defines what constitutes a “material change in circumstances” required to modify an existing custody order. It specifically addresses parental relocation as a material change, and removes specific mileage thresholds. Rather, it focuses on the impact of relocation on the non-relocating parent’s relationship with the child and provides for an expedited hearing if relocation would significantly interfere with parenting time.

Actions Parents Should Take When Involved in a Custody Dispute

Although the new Maryland child custody law brings greater clarity to the best interests of the child standard and more certainty regarding the outcome of a dispute, these child custody matters can still be very stressful for families. Importantly, there are several things that parents should do when facing a contested child custody matter to ensure their parental rights are protected and the best interests of their child are met:

• Focus on your child: The best interests of your child should always come first and foremost. Be sure to frame your custody arguments around the health, safety, needs, and welfare of your child, not your personal grievances against the other parent.
• Document your case: Documentation is key in a child custody dispute. It’s crucial to thoroughly document your involvement in your child’s life. Keep a detailed log of all parenting time, communications with your co-parent, and the specifics of the interaction with your child. Maintain copies of school records, medical records, teacher communications, and doctor appointment summaries to show your involvement in health and education matters.
• Seek legal counsel: Child custody matters can be complex. It’s essential to consult with a knowledgeable attorney who can best evaluate your case under the new statutory framework.

In addition, be sure to follow any existing court orders. Failure to do so can significantly harm your custody case and result in serious legal consequences, such as being held in contempt of court.

Contact an Experienced Maryland Child Custody Attorney

If you have questions about the new Maryland child custody laws, it’s essential to consult with a knowledgeable attorney. At the Law Office of Shelly M. Ingram, our Fulton, Maryland divorce and family law attorneys are dedicated to providing trusted representation for a wide range of family law matters, including those involving child custody and custody modifications. Our attorneys are trained in collaborative divorce, mediation, and traditional divorce litigation. To schedule a confidential consultation, call us at (240) 652-2596">(240) 652-2596 or contact us online.

Although many people traditionally viewed prenuptial agreements as a tool for the wealthy, they are no longer simply for those who are of high net-worth. These contracts are for any couple who wishes to protect the assets they bring into the marriage, keep debts separate, and safeguard business interests. Importantly, couples in the 21st century may also use prenups to encourage financial transparency, clarify financial expectations during the marriage, and ensure individual financial obligations are defined.

The following are several modern considerations for newly engaged couples who are contemplating entering into a prenuptial agreement in Maryland:

1. Clarification of Financial Expectations

A significant reason many couples enter into a prenup is to help prevent protracted litigation over property division in the event of divorce. However, these agreements can also be a powerful tool to encourage financial transparency and clarify financial expectations before a marriage begins and for years to follow. To create a durable prenuptial agreement a couple will need to discuss financial planning and objectives. These conversations can help to reduce the potential for disputes that may arise over money matters in the future.

2. Digital Assets

Many couples today possess not only traditional assets, but also digital assets. These types of assets should also be addressed in a prenup, just as any other property. Digital assets can include the following:

• Cryptocurrency
• Online businesses
• Domain names
• Social media accounts
• Intellectual property
• Airline miles
• Credit card points

A prenup should specify how each digital asset will be characterized in the event of divorce, as well as clarify how revenues from a digital asset would be divided. For instance, a prenup might clarify that any digital asset owned by either spouse prior to marriage be treated as his or her separate property, and also any income the digital asset generates.

3. Debt Management

Modern prenuptial agreements can be a crucial tool for ensuring debts, such as student loans and credit cards, are kept separate. A prenup can help ensure that each spouse remains responsible for paying individual debts, as well as define how debts incurred during the marriage are shared. Alternatively, if a spouse assists the other with paying down separate debts, a prenup can provide for reimbursement in divorce.

4. Lifestyle and Career Clauses

Prenups can include lifestyle and career clauses that define each spouse’s expectations beyond finances. For instance, they may specify penalties for infidelity (such as forfeiture of assets or alimony) or prohibit posting private or slanderous comments about a spouse on social media. Partners may also outline compensation a spouse would receive in a divorce if they gave up their career to care for children or support the other spouse’s career. However, lifestyle and career clauses may not be grossly unfair or violate public policy.

5. Social Media and Privacy Clauses

Social media and privacy clauses can legally define how couples share information about each other on social media. These clauses can prohibit posting private photos, regulate tagging, and establish rules for posting during the marriage and in the event of divorce. A prenuptial agreement can provide financial or other penalties that may be imposed for violations.

6. Business Interests

A solid prenuptial agreement can prevent a spouse’s business interests from becoming subject to equitable distribution in divorce. It can specifically define a business as the sole property of the spouse who originally owned it, along with any appreciation in value that occurs during the marriage. A clause addressing business interests can also specify that the non-owner should have no control over business operations, voting rights, management decisions, or any other aspect of the business - even if both spouses supported and participated in the business during the marriage.

7. Pet Custody

Although child custody matters cannot be determined in a prenup, pet custody can be addressed. Sometimes referred to on its own as a “petnup,” this clause can dictate pet ownership and care in the event a couple parts ways. While Maryland law still views pets as property, rather than members of the family, these agreements can outline who gets to keep the pet in a divorce and any visitation rights, as well as how expenses associated with the pet will be paid.

8. Sunset Clause

Couples often enter into prenups to protect their assets during the first few years of marriage. Under Maryland law, a sunset clause may be included in a prenuptial agreement that makes the document null and void after a certain period of time or the occurrence of a specific event. For example, a couple might agree that the prenup should expire after ten years of marriage or the birth of a child. Once the agreement is no longer valid, the couple might choose to enter into a postnuptial agreement. Otherwise, Maryland law would dictate the division of property and other financial matters in divorce.

Contact an Experienced Maryland Prenuptial Agreement Attorney

If you and your partner are considering entering into a prenuptial agreement, it’s important to ensure it is customized to fit your specific goals and financial needs. At the Law Office of Shelly M. Ingram, our Fulton, Maryland divorce attorneys provide our clients with high-quality legal services for a broad scope of matrimonial and family law matters, including drafting, negotiating, and litigating prenuptial and postnuptial agreements. Trained in collaborative divorce, mediation, and traditional divorce litigation strategies, we work closely with our clients to achieve a favorable outcome in every case.